Rant and Reason.

I’m in a cranky mood today; I happened upon yet another tirade about why the IJS (International Judging System) is death to figure skating… by someone whom I consider to be a Very Smart Figure Skating Person, Sonia Bianchetti. Ms. Bianchetti is an international figure skating judge and I’m sure she could skate circles around me when it comes to her knowledge and experience, but I (humbly) disagree with everything she says in this article. I’m not picking on her specifically, since there have been others that hold similar view-points, such as: Janet Lynn and to a lesser extent, journalist Phil Hersh, but this article just more or less fell into my lap.

Mme Bianchetti, I’ll let you start.

“The new system, implemented to assure more impartial scoring, actually vivisected the sport’s history and personality”

Ewww… sounds nasty… go on.

“Based on “absolute judging”, it moved scoring to awarding points to specific elements, regardless of their quality.”

What?? I thought the GOE was supposed to reward the quality (or lack thereof) in an element! What about the downgrades?

“By emphasizing difficulty for the sake of difficulty, the new system diminished the emphasis on quality and artistry.”

But if it’s a sports competition, then wouldn’t it be reasonable to expect that the athletes who did the most difficult elements better than the other competitors should be rewarded for it?

“What now matters to the skaters is the number of revolutions in jumps and in spins on each foot and in each position!”

Let’s be fair here, Ms B., from the get-go, the number of revolutions in a jump has always mattered, spins were more of an afterthought and were considered rest breaks. We know that ultimately the winner used to be the ice skater who could pull off the most revolutions in the air and not fall on the landing – everything else in the program was really just filler.

“To give the technical panel clear guidance to assign levels to the various elements, more and more details have been added, year after year. The initial simple idea, which had some merit, was turned into an incomprehensible and very complicated system.”

Uh-huh…. You mean introducing some standard of objectivity… “Had some merit”? At least now we can compare apples with apples. Yes, every year there are modifications to the system; it’s nitpicky, but not rocket science. It’s also not as complicated as you seem to think. It’s a lot easier to understand than say, exchange traded funds or quantum chromodynamics, that’s for sure.

“The “level” in spins, lifts, death spirals and step sequences is what has killed the creativity and the artistry of the sport.”

Yes, I know, all the pundits complain that everyone is doing the same programs to max out their points. But, when I look back at videos from skaters in the pre-IJS era, they were all pretty much doing the same spins too. A combo spin was basically anything that had an upright spin tacked onto it. The ladies would do a very lovely layback spin and the gents would do a cross foot spin. The guys all went to the same costume designer too. And really, except for creative giants like Toller Cranston, John Curry and Christopher Dean, the figure skating world is not the hot-bed for artistic expression and creativity that are to be found in the performing arts.

Except… have a look at American ice dancers  Meryl Davis and Charlie White’s short dance from 2013. Look me right in the eye, and tell me there’s no artistry happening here! Balletomanes will notice that they reference the actual choreography from Act 1 of the ballet “Giselle” around the 2:30 mark.

What do you think? Does Ms. Bianchetti have valid gripes? Here`s a link to her article. Is there more to the story? Watch next week’s post for details!

This entry was posted in figure skating, figure skating judge, GOE, ice dancers, Ice skating, IJS. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Rant and Reason.

  1. Jeff says:

    Well not to toot my own horn or anything but here are a half dozen or so posts on the matter. . . http://la-skatedad.blogspot.com/search/label/Scoring

  2. Kerry says:

    I have the confidence that only ignorance can bring. Having never competed, under either scenario, I am not sure of all the scoring. But, I am working on a program. My (otherwise) great coach tried to get me to put a lutz and a flip in the second half of my program. I had no gas left in the tank to do it there. Move the flip to the first move, and it’s game on. I had thought that spins were always counted by revolutions. Perhaps that was part of the old test? I remember counting revolutions as a kid, in the 70′s. From my limited knowledge, I think the new rules have made skating harder. It’s a way to separate the boys from the men.

    The issue of bringing popularity back to the sport, has more to do with television style and the touring shows. The public at large can not relate to classical music, men with flounce on their shirt, etc. Better would be tunes from string makeovers, like those of Vitamin String Quartet. This is 2013, not 1953, The real skating competitions are aired as part of weekend afternoon sports. But, is this when women are around? I think the shows should be aired at times similar to Dancing with the Starts. And, there isn’t enough of the physical effort, athleticism (jump height, spin speeds) explained by the broadcasters to make the sport somewhat appealing to men. I remember a football coach watching figure skating Olympics and admiring the skaters as athletes. Remember those shows like Ice Capades? It created a dream for kids and was responsible for alot of kids, like me, to join skating. Remember they had a part where the kids in the audience got to ride around in the little sleighs, being pushed by the fancy women? Las Vegas shows have never gone out of style, and neither have skating choruses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Confirm you are human.